Printer Friendly, PDF & Email

Retaliation: A treacherous risk we should include in our risk assessments

Joe Murphy (jemurphy5730@gmail.com) is a Senior Advisor at Compliance Strategists, SCCE’s Director of Public Policy, and Editor-in-Chief of CEP Magazine.

Bribery. Antitrust. Harassment. Environment. We already have plenty of risks to consider in our compliance programs. But here is one risk everyone has but almost everyone underestimates and omits from their risk assessments: retaliation.

From the earliest days of the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines standards, the concept of retaliation (initially called “retribution”) has been embedded in the compliance program standards. But it was only mentioned in the context of people being able to report violations without fear of retaliation. Retaliation is more than a factor in perfecting helplines. It can also be a poison that corrupts cultures and ruins compliance programs. It can even represent conduct that is itself illegal. In the European Union, for example, the new directive on whistleblower protection will bring more attention to this risk. 

This document is only available to members. Please log in or become a member.


This document is only available to subscribers. Please log in or register for complimentary access.

* required field