'Speak-up' culture can keep problems from becoming violations

A version of this story originally appeared in Report on Research ComplianceRSCC’s sister publication. For more information, visit http://bit.ly/2UCfpb4.

The complaint came in anonymously, recalled Joshua Toas, vice president of compliance at the State University of New York (SUNY) Research Foundation. “My manager harasses me, doesn’t let me do X, Y, and Z. It’s a violation of policy,” the person alleged. “Well, we have 17,000 employees, [and] that’s the extent of the complaint. I don’t know what campus you’re at, what location you’re at, what program you’re in,” said Toas. In this case, the person didn’t respond to follow-up questions, even though they were posed through a channel that would have allowed the employee to remain unidentified.

“There’s no way for me to conduct an investigation under those circumstances,” he added. “I make the assumption that it wasn’t really a problem” if the person won’t reveal more details, but “there’s always this thing in the back of my head” cautioning that maybe there is a real issue.

Training employees and vendors to provide enough information so that a complaint can be acted upon is something that organizations don’t always do well, said Jeneeta O’Connor, compliance manager for Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center. But it’s crucial to ensuring that investigations can go forward using this valuable tool that preserves anonymity, said both O’Connor and Toas during a talk at the 19th Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute sponsored by the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics, which publishes both Report on Research Compliance and Report on Supply Chain Compliance.[1]

Whether the concerns are expressed anonymously through a hotline or online, or raised, perhaps tentatively, through a talk with a supervisor, institutions should have their ears to the ground to hear about possible violations of laws and policies within their own organizations and supply chains. In fact, they should work through multiple channels to create and/or encourage a speak-up culture, argued Toas and O’Connor. This is especially important now that the Department of Justice is routinely pursuing False Claims Act and overcharging cases against universities and research institutions, with settlements worth more than USD 16 million announced so far this year.[2]

This document is only available to subscribers. Please log in or purchase access.

Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field