JASON Urges NSF to Guard Against Racial, Ethnic Profiling in Research Security Program

If the National Science Foundation (NSF) creates a research program on research security, it should make every effort to ensure the United States remains “the premier destination for top scholars around the world [and] must avoid creating a reputation of racial profiling or injustice,” the independent science advisory group known as JASON concluded in a recent report considering what such a research program might entail.[1]

“The products of a research program on research security must not be used to disadvantage anyone based on their ethnic background or country of origin,” JASON wrote in the report, in which the NSF asked the group to consider the definition of research security, how that definition might differ from discipline to discipline, what central research themes should be addressed as well as which are most urgent, what critical research communities must be engaged and what data and privacy controls will be required for research on research security.

In the report, released March 30, JASON developed definitions of research security and research integrity to distinguish between the two disciplines. JASON also provided topic areas for a possible NSF program solicitation; it noted that the social sciences will be important for a successful research program on research security.[2]

Overall, JASON found the concept of such a research program to be valuable.

This document is only available to subscribers. Please log in or purchase access.
 


Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field