Comparing risks: Physician employment and clinical integration

Ellis "Mac" Knight (mknight@cokergroup.com) is Senior Vice President/CMO at the Coker Group in Alpharetta, GA.

Most healthcare administrators and compliance managers are well versed in the risks related to hospital-physician employment models, for example, employed physician networks (EPNs). The Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) are also well understood by providers who must abide by these statutes once they go to work for hospitals and healthcare systems. What is not well known, however, are the compliance risks associated with participation in a clinically integrated network (CIN) and that these organizations may, in fact, be more perilous to traverse from a risk perspective than more traditional alignment models.

This article will explore the critical rules and regulations related to EPNs and CINS and compare and contrast these two organizational structures. The intent is to provide valuable information for those healthcare organizations (hospitals, healthcare systems, and physician practices) that are considering entering into one of these two models.

This document is only available to members. Please log in or become a member.
 


Would you like to read this entire article?

If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

* required field